On a Christmas Day that was anything but merry for the Washington Commanders, fans were left wondering why promising quarterback Sam Hartman wasn't given the chance to start against the Dallas Cowboys. The decision, or rather the lack of it, has sparked intense speculation and debate among football enthusiasts and insiders alike.
Commanders OC Kliff Kingsbury had a straightforward answer: it wouldn't be fair to have Sam Hartman make his first start on a short week. However, this explanation, while tactful, leaves many unanswered questions. Hartman, an undrafted free agent, has shown flashes of brilliance and has been touted by some as a potential future starter for the team.
Kingsbury's rationale seems to revolve around the idea that Hartman's inexperience and the short preparation time could lead to a less than optimal performance. This could potentially harm the team's morale and standing with fans. However, critics argue that giving Hartman a chance could have provided a fresh perspective and a much-needed spark to a struggling offense. The Commanders' offensive woes are well-documented, and some believe that a fresh face at the helm could have brought a new dynamic to the game.
The decision to bench Hartman has also raised eyebrows due to the team's recent struggles. The Commanders, under Kingsbury's offensive scheme, have faced significant challenges this season. Fans and analysts have been quick to point out that the offense has often looked disjointed and ineffective. In this context, Hartman's potential as a wild card who could shake things up and bring a new energy to the team has been highlighted. Critics question why the team isn't taking a risk with Hartman, especially given the dire state of the offense.
Despite the controversy, Kingsbury remains steadfast in his decision, often citing the need for stability and experience in crucial games. However, this stance has not gone unchallenged. Some fans and analysts feel that the team's reluctance to give Hartman a shot represents a larger issue within the organization—a reluctance to take risks and innovate. This perspective is bolstered by the fact that Hartman has been praised for his leadership qualities and his ability to rally the team in tough situations.
In conclusion, the case of Sam Hartman and his uneventful debut against the Cowboys offers a glimpse into the strategic and psychological complexities of professional football. The decision to bench him, while rooted in practical concerns, also reflects a broader debate about the value of experience versus potential and the role of risk-taking in sports. As the Commanders look ahead, the question of when, and if, Hartman will get his chance to lead the team remains a topic of intense interest and speculation.
