A Christmas Eve livestream has left the internet in turmoil as controversial streamer Clavicular, whose real name is Braden Peters, finds himself at the center of a horrifying incident. The Kick streamer was live broadcasting from his Tesla Cybertruck when a person hopped onto the hood. The Cybertruck proceeded to move forward, running over the individual, sparking widespread online concern and criticism. Clavicular, known for his provocative behavior, has claimed self-defense, alleging the person was a stalker who had been harassing him and jumping on his vehicle.
The livestream, which unfolded on December 24th, has quickly gone viral, causing shock and outrage among viewers. Clavicular, who has a history of controversial behavior, posted several updates on X, the social media platform, defending his actions. One update included an AI-generated image depicting the aftermath of the incident. The image showed his Cybertruck with a person on the hood, captioned with the provocative statement, "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
In the aftermath of the incident, Clavicular has been banned from the Kick platform, where the live broadcast was originally aired. The ban comes after a rapid backlash from the online community, with many users demanding accountability for the streamer's actions. The platform's decision reflects the severity of the situation and the need for stricter guidelines regarding livestream content.
Clavicular’s associate, Kick star Adin Ross, provided an update to ease the growing concern. He confirmed that the person allegedly run over by Clavicular is not dead, despite widespread rumors and speculation. This revelation comes as a relief to many who were following the incident closely, though questions remain about the person's condition and the legality of Clavicular’s actions.
The incident has drawn significant attention not only for its shocking nature but also for the legal and ethical implications it raises. Clavicular’s claim of self-defense has been met with skepticism, as many argue that his actions were disproportionate and reckless. The viral nature of the footage has also prompted discussions about the responsibility of streamers and platforms in handling controversial content.
As the investigation into the incident continues, the online community awaits further updates. Clavicular’s actions have sparked a broader conversation about accountability and the potential dangers of livestreaming. While the streamer has faced significant backlash, his claims of self-defense raise important questions about the complexities of online interactions and the legal protections available to content creators.
