In the ever-evolving landscape of political commentary, Candace Owens has once again found herself at the center of a media storm. The conservative commentator has made shocking claims about French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron, stirring up a mix of reactions from both political and legal communities.
Owens, known for her controversial statements and strong conservative views, has asserted that the Macrons had paid for her assassination. These claims came in the midst of a legal battle where the Macrons sued Owens for defamation over her previous statements about Brigitte Macron's gender identity. The lawsuit initially sought a jury trial and punitive damages, alleging that Owens had repeatedly and falsely claimed that Brigitte Macron is a man.
The legal drama took an unexpected turn when the Macrons announced they were abandoning their defamation lawsuit against Owens. This decision has sparked a flurry of reactions from legal and political experts, who are now questioning the underlying reasons for the sudden withdrawal. Despite the withdrawal, the controversy surrounding the allegations remains a hot topic, with many speculating about the potential impact on both Owens' career and the broader political discourse.
The lawsuit was originally filed in July 2025 at the Superior Court in Delaware, where the Macrons sought damages for defamation and false light. Owens, in response, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the claims were unfounded and that her statements were protected under free speech provisions.
This latest chapter in the ongoing saga highlights the polarizing nature of Owens' public persona and the complexities of international legal battles. As the dust settles, the public continues to watch closely, awaiting any further developments in the case.
